Distinguishing Judgments from Feelings
Bob
Kroepel
Copyright © 2012
Lakeside Studios
20 South Shore Road'
New Durham, NH USA 03855-2107
We can distinguish judgments
from feelings.
A feeling can be
operationally defined as a reaction to a realization of a desire or
fear. When an individual gets what he wants (when he gets what he
desires), he typically reacts with good feelings of happiness, i.e.
with the emotional reaction of happiness and the impulsive reaction to
celebrate; when an individual does not get what he wants (when an
individual gets what he fears), he typically reacts with bad feelings
of unhappiness as sadness, anger, or/and fear and with an impulsive
reaction to give up inre sadness, to attack himself or/and someone or
something else inre anger, or to run away from himself or/and someone
or something else.
More info inre feelings can be found thus:
http://www.bobkwebsite.com/oppsych2.html
A judgment can be
operationally defined as a choice inre an action or reaction to take
inre getting or not getting what is wanted (desired) or not-wanted
(feared).
An individual has standards for what he wants and does not want.
If an individual perceives, recognizes, and evaluates the realization
who/which is a person, object or event who/which meets his standards
for someone or something or some action (event) which is wanted, then
the individual makes a judgment that the person, object or event is
desirable and takes action to get (achieve, obtain, establish a
relationship with) that person, object or event, which is observable by
his approach behavior towards that desirable person, object or event
and by his positive emotional reaction of happiness ranging from
contentment to joy.
If an individual perceives, recognizes, and evaluates the realization
who/which is a person, object or event who/which meets his standards
for someone, something or some action (event) which is not-wanted, then
the individual makes a judgement that the person, object or events is
undesirable and takes action to get away from (not achieve, obtain,
establish a causal relationship with) that person, object or event,
which is observable by his avoidance behavior away from that
undesirable person, object or event and by his emotional reaction of
unhappiness as sadness, anger or/and fear and his impulsive reactions
as giving up inre sadness, attacking himself or someone or something
else inre anger, or/and running away from himself or someone or
something else inre fear.
Studies are showing that judgments can be made subconsciously and an
individual only becomes aware he has made subconscious judgments when
he realizes that he is (A) in motion to achieve who/what he wants
(who/what he desires) or avoid who/what he does not want (who/what he
fears) and (B) he has an emotional reaction and an impulsive reaction
inre anticipating getting what he wants or not getting what he wants.
Subconscious judgments are subconscious decisions, which are part of
the problem-solving process.
A problem is learning/deciding how to achieve a desire (get who/what is
wanted) or avoid a fear (not get who/what is not wanted).
The Problem-Solving Process
1. State the problem (define what is the desire to be achieved/fear to
be avoided, who/what is wanted or who/what is not wanted).
2. Generate alternative solutions to the problem.
3. Evaluate the positives/pros/desirable consequences and
negatives/cons/undesirable consequences inre each alternative.
4. Choose the alternative with the better/best positive/pros and/or the
fewer/fewest negatives/cons.
5. Implement the decision—try the chosen solution.
6. Evaluate the actual consequences to determine if or not the chosen
solution solves the problem; if not, then repeat Steps 2-6.
The decision-making process consists of Steps 3-4 of the
problem-solving process.
Both the problem-solving and decision-making processes can occur
subconsciously as well as consciously.
Successes and mistakes can occur when an individual makes
judgments/decisions regardless of whether he makes conscious or
subconscious judgments.
Ex: Inre the desire to avoid getting a lemon/fear of getting a lemon
inre making a decision inre getting a car, and individual can get/not
get a lemon by making a judgment between a snazzy yellow convertible or
a stodgy station wagon (or SUV), both of which will satisfy his desire
for a car.
Logic in the form of If P, Then Q logical arguments/syllogisms can be
employed inre the decision-making process within the problem-solving
process.
P = Conditions/Causes
Q = Consequence(s)/Effect(s)
When evaluating the imagined/intuited consequences of each alternative
solution, the individual can create If P, Then Q syllogisms thus:
If (P) I choose the yellow convertible, then (Q) I imagine/intuit and
therefore hope I will be able to get from Point A to Point B (not get a
lemon) and attract wild chicks along the way.
If (P) I choose the stodgy station (SUV), then (Q) I imagine/intuit and
therefore hope I will be able to get from Point A to Point B (not get a
lemon) and attract steady, reliable, marrying-kind of chicks along the
way (because they realize what a sensible guy I am and the
station wagon can be used for carrying bulky things including baby
carriages and cribs).
These If P, Then Q syllogisms can be created and implemented
consciously or subconsciously. Either way they are forms of logic, and
they are intuitions and predictions of the positive and negative
consequences/effects of evaluations of alternative solutions to a
problem—learning how to achieve a desire and get who/what is wanted or
avoid a fear and not get who/what is not wanted.