Evolution vs Creationism


Bob Kroepel
Copyright © 2014
Lakeside Studios
20 South Shore Road
New Durham NH USA 03855

Evolution vs Creationism


Any 'discussion' of creationism v evolution could be stopped quickly by an evolutionist who demands that the creationist follow the scientific method which requires that all concepts (mental representations or ideas of persons or objects) and principles (mental representations/ideas of causal or coincidental relationships between or among people and/or objects) which are to be used in the discussion be verifiable (provable by physical evidence—people, objects or/and events who/which are comprised of m/e—matter-energy—in contrast to being the subjects of ideas), falsifiable (disprovable by physical evidence) and verified (proven by physical evidence).

Proof consists of physical evidence, defined as people, objects and/or events who/which are comprised of matter and/or energy (m/e) and who/which as causes cause as effects (A) changes in the physical states including inertial states of people, objects and events or (B) new people, objects or/and events from pre-existing m/e.

Evolution has physical evidence which serves as proof which serves to verify/prove true the concepts and principles of evolution but creationists have no physical evidence that can verify/prove true the existence of the supernatural beings (SNBs) they need to 'explain' and 'justify' creationism, therefore the concepts and principles they use for 'explaining' creationism are unverifiable and unfalsifiable and therefore are not acceptable for scientific discussions.

Proof of macroevolution …

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=evidence+of+macroevolution&gbv=2&oq=evidence+of+macroevolution&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3..0j0i22i30l9.1031.6874.0.18082.26.24.0.2.2.1.263.2899.4j12j4.20.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..5.21.2669.zK6wpHWgRgc

Proof of microevolution …

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=evidence+of+microevolution&gbv=2&oq=evidence+of+microevolution&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3..0.2133.8833.0.11171.26.23.0.3.3.0.207.1892.15j6j1.22.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..1.25.1932.4mKDoSKALbY

Proof evolution is accepted to be a fact by biologists …

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=do+biologists+agree+evolution+is+a+fact%3F&gbv=2&oq=do+biologists+agree+evolution+is+a+fact%3F&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3...1321.15467.0.17018.47.9.3.35.38.0.219.1010.5j3j1.9.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..32.15.1043.MavsYxplkyE

The Bible contains contradictions (two or more stories, called doublets, that contain conflicting information inre the same people, objects and/or events), historical and scientific inaccuracies, parallels (mythological people, objects and events who/which are similar if not identical to mythological people, objects and events found in other myths/religions), and fictions (prophecies that either 1. are false because they did not occur or 2. were not relevant to the people to whom or inre whom the prophecies were made)that humans have a right to expect would not appear in a 'holy book' that supposedly was either written or inspired or supervised by God(s) that disqualifies the Bible as a reliable source of information inre God (Yahweh) or the gods (Elohim). Creationists need to 'explain' and and prove by physical evidence and thereby 'justify' creationism.

Biblical Contradictions

Google: biblical contradictions:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=biblical+contradictions&gbv=2&oq=biblical+con&gs_l=heirloom-hp.1.0.0l10.1772.33734.0.37498.20.14.4.2.2.0.183.1131.11j3.14.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.20.1204.uRMWWcyI-uQ

Biblical Historical inaccuracies

Google: biblical historical inaccuracies

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=biblical+historical+inaccuracies&gbv=2&oq=biblical+historical&gs_l=heirloom-hp.1.1.0l10.1849.7367.0.10072.19.13.0.6.6.0.95.776.13.13.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.19.820.EOwhKkQhmAM

Biblical Scientific inaccuracies

Google: biblical scientific inaccuracies

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=biblical+scientific+inaccuracies&gbv=2&oq=biblical+scientific+inaccuracies&gs_l=heirloom-hp.13..0.1220.16871.0.20726.34.19.0.15.7.0.64.818.19.19.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..9.25.811.rBL8Pxq7z_4

Biblical Parallels

Google: biblical parallels

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=biblical+parallels&gbv=2&oq=biblical+parallels&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3..0l9.1586.7589.0.13047.18.13.0.5.5.0.64.489.13.13.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.18.547.autj4tysbEM

See especially …

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/31885/31885-h/31885-h.htm

… and …

http://www.danielmiessler.com/blog/the-bible-is-fiction-a-collection-of-evidence

Biblical Fictions

Google: biblical prophecies debunked

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=biblical+prophecies+debunked&gbv=2&oq=biblical+prophecie&gs_l=heirloom-hp.1.7.0l10.1372.9534.0.13398.18.14.0.4.4.0.79.815.14.14.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.18.849.vhrKZrFKJCE

Summary: Proof consists of physical evidence, defined as people, objects and/or events who/which are comprised of matter and/or energy (m/e) and who/which as causes cause as effects (A) changes in the physical states including inertial states of people, objects and events or (B) new people, objects or/and events from pre-existing m/e.

Evolutionists have physical evidence that serves as proof that evolution (both macroevolution and microevolution) has occurred on the Earth.

Evolutionists do not have a theory of the cause of abiogenesis or the formation of life from non-life.

Because the Bible contains contradictions, historical inaccuracies, scientific inaccuracies, parallels, and fictions, creationists cannot claim the Bible is a reliable source of information inre God (Yahweh) or the gods (Elohim), and if they depend upon the Bible as their source of information then, as shown, they have no physical evidence to serve as proof that serves as the basis for a god-theory (or a gods-theory) of abiogenesis or evolution, therefore creationists have no credibility and therefore no standing nor relevance inre 'proving' their theory of creationism. The creationists' theory of creationism inre evolution is therefore no more than an opinion.