Operational Philosophy

Copyright © 2000
Robert Howard Kroepel
Lakeside Studios
20 South Shore Road
New Durham, New Hampshire, USA 03655-2107

Contents

Operational Philosophy

 Operational Philosophy

The Greek Definition of the Term Philosophy

Philosophy = Greek: "philo": "love" + "sophy": "knowledge" = "Love of Knowledge."

The Operational Philosophy Definition of the Term Philosophy

Operational Philosophy, OpPhil, is a system of philosophy, a philosophical theory, a theory of philosophy, which requires and therefore includes operational definitions of important terms used in the field of philosophy (1) for the purpose of conceptualizing reality and (2) for the purpose of solving problems.

Operational definitions, opdefs, are defined and explained in the following section, Operational Definitions.

Briefly, operational definitions define and thereby specify terms and phrases by presenting descriptions of the observations and/or measurements of the people, objects and events related to, and therefore relevant to, the term/phrase being defined.

The concepts and related principles of people, objects and events are explained in the section, People, Objects and Events.

One fundamental operational question inre: operational definitions, is this: What do people/objects/events do when they  _____ [term/phrase being defined operationally]?

Operational definitions function as operational answers to operational questions.

Inre: Philosophy, the fundamental operational question is this: What do people do when they do philosophy?

Inre: Philosophy, the fundamental operational answer to the fundamental operational question is this: When people do philosophy they create concepts and principles which describe people/objects/events and techniques for applying the concepts and principles (1) for the purpose of conceptualizing reality and (2) for the purpose of solving problems.

Concepts, principles and techniques are defined and explained in the section, Concepts, Principles and Techniques.

Philosophy is a term used for (1) a field of study, (2) a process of developing a philosophy, and (3) a personal or organizational set of concepts, principles and techniques.

The field of study called philosophy is the organized study of the process, including standards and guidelines for thought, by which people develop the concepts, principles and techniques they use (1) for observing, analyzing, understanding, evaluating, organizing, and dealing with themselves and the people, objects and events who and/or which comprise reality and (2) for solving problems.

The process of philosophy is the specification of the operational definitions and the standards and guidelines for the logic to be used (A) for the field of study which is called philosophy and (B) for the development of an individual's personal set of concepts/principles/techniques, which is called a personal philosophy, or for an organization's set of concepts/principles/techniques, which is called an organizational philosophy.

A personal philosophy is an individual’s set of concepts/principles/techniques; an organizational philosophy is an organization's set of concepts/principles/techniques, the set of concepts/principles/techniques the individuals within an organization develop for the organization.

The concept and relevant principles of a personal philosophy are defined, specified and explained in the section, Personal Philosophy.

The concept and relevant principles of an organizational philosophy are defined, specified and explained in the section, Organizational Philosophy.

Philosophy is the field of study of the process, including standards and guidelines for thought and for logic, by which people develop concepts and principles which describe people, objects and events, and techniques for using the concepts and principles (1) for the purpose of observing, analyzing, understanding, evaluating, organizing, and dealing with themselves and other people, objects, and events who/which comprise reality and (2) for the purpose of solving problems.

Operational Definitions

Operational definitions are descriptions of the observations and measurements of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined.

One fundamental question inre: operational definitions, is this: What do people/objects/events do when they  _____ [term/phrase being defined operationally]

Operational definitions function as operational answers to operational questions.

Examples:

Operational Question: What do people do when they do philosophy?
Operational Answer: When people do philosophy they create concepts and principles which describe people, objects and events and they develop techniques for using the concepts and principles (1) for conceptualizing reality and (2) for solving problems.

Operational Question: What do people do when they love?
Operational Answer: When people do love they say they like each other and they do nice, good objects for and with each other.

Operational definitions can be created using structured sentences such as the following:

_____ [Term being defined operationally] IS _____ [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined].

Example: The mind [Term being defined operationally] IS an individual’s personal system of desires/fears/priorities as evidenced by his observable actions and reactions, in particular, as evidenced by his approach behavior to  people/objects/events he desires and his avoidance behavior from people/objects/events he fears [Descriptions of the observable/measurable people/objects/events--in this case the events of approach/avoidance--relevant to the term being defined].

_____ [Term being defined operationally] IS WHEN _____ [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined].

Example: Love [Term being defined operationally] IS WHEN someone says they like you and they do nice things for you and with you [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined].

IF _____ [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined],
THEN _____ [Term being defined operationally].

Example: IF someone says he likes you and does nice things for you and with you [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined],
THEN that is love [Term being defined operationally].

WHEN _____ [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined],
THEN _____ [Term being defined operationally].

Example: WHEN someone says he likes you and does nice things for you and with you [Description of the objects/events relevant to the term being defined],
THEN that is love [Term being defined operationally].

Most Famous Humorous Example of an Operational Definition: Happiness is a warm puppy. [Charles Shulz, Peanuts.]

By operational definitions, abstract concepts/principles can be defined by the descriptions of real-world objects/events/techniques; thus, by operational definitions, abstract concepts/principles/techniques can be made concrete/made into concrete concepts/principles/techniques.

If a person cannot provide a description by means of the observation(s)/measurement(s) of the people/objects/events related to a term he wishes to define/use in a discussion, then there is an excellent chance that (A) the people/objects/events he is trying to define/discuss do not exist or (B) he does not know what he is talking about.

Operational definitions are required for The Code of Science.

The Code of Science is defined, specified and explained in the section, The Code of Science.

The reason operational definitions are required for The Code of Science is to ensure that scientists can communicate effectively with each other and with nonscientists.

Likewise, operational definitions are required for any field of study to ensure that people can communicate effectively with each other within the field and with other people not in the field.

Personal Philosophy

A person is operationally defined to be an individual, a unique, specific, human being, comprised of matter and energy, and having a mind and a body.

An individual's personal philosophy is his set/system/collection of concepts/principles/techniques for analyzing/evaluating/judging the causality [causal relationships/cause-and-effect relationships between/among people/objects/events] of the people/objects/events of reality, who/which are the natural phenomena of reality; an individual creates a personal philosophy from his experiences in determining which people/objects/events in reality and which concepts/principles/techniques [ideas/thoughts/thinking] in his mind realize/achieve positively/negatively his desires/fears/priorities.

Organizational Philosophy

An organization is group of individuals, unique human beings, who have agreed to work together to develop and to achieve common desires.

An organizational philosophy is the set of concepts/principles/techniques individuals within the organization have chosen for analyzing/evaluating/judging the causality [causal relationships/cause-and-effect relationships between/among people/objects/events] of the people/objects/events of reality, who/which are the natural phenomena of reality; the individuals within an organization create an organizational philosophy from their experiences in determining which people/objects/events in reality and which concepts/principles/techniques [ideas/thoughts/thinking] realize/achieve positively/negatively their individual and organizational desires/fears/priorities.

Reality [Natural Phenomena]

All reality consists of people, objects and events. [All natural phenomena consist of people, objects and events.]

People, Objects and Events

    A person is a human being, the physiology of biology, physics and chemistry which is the person's body and which produces the psychology of desires, fears, priorities, and feelings which comprise a person's mind, but a person is first and foremost an object. People generally do not like to be considered objects, however, therefore the subcategory of people (a subcategory of objects) is created to appease those who insist on such a subcategory.
    An object is a thing comprised of matter/energy which retains its identity over a longer period of time than an event.     An event is a relationship between or among objects and which occurs over a much shorter period of time than the identities of objects.     The distinction between/among objects and events is arbitrary and relative to an individual's need to speak of objects/objects vs. events/relationships among objects.     When we want to cut down the time dimension, we can speak sensibly and reasonably of a person being an object and an event being a short period of time in which a relationship between/among objects occurs.

Truth and Falsity

    Truth is the accurate mental representation (idea) of a person/object/event. A true idea.
    Falsity is an inaccurate mental representation (idea) of a person/object/event. A false idea.

Concepts, Principles and Techniques

    A concept is a mental representation [idea] of an object.
    A true concept is an accurate mental representation of an object.
    A false concept is an inaccurate mental representation of an object.
    A principle is a mental representation [idea] of an event.
    A true principle is an accurate mental representation of an event.
    A false principle is an inaccurate mental representation of an event.
    A technique is a practical application of [method of using] a principle.     A true technique is a practical application of a principle.
    A false technique is an impractical application of a principle.

Causality

Causality is the principle that describes the events in which people/objects/events who/which are causes cause/create people/objects/events who/which are effects.

Causes precede effects.

Causes cause effects.

Effects are caused by causes.

Effects follow causes.

Causality is the cause-and-effect relationships among objects and events.

Causality is people/objects/events who/which are causes causing people/objects/events who/which are effects.

The Source of Causality

The source of causality is matter and energy. All events which are actions and reactions which are relationships among people/objects which are matter require energy. The concept of energy requires the principle that no person or object is moved or changed nor any event caused without energy. Gods and goddesses, and demons and demonnesses, if they exist, must use energy to cause effects as movement and change among people/objects/events.
    First Law of Thermodynamics: Matter and energy cannot be destroyed, only changed in form (results of thermodynamic—heat—experiments by Sadi Carnot and chemical experiments by Antoine LeVoissier). Matter and energy were never created: they have always existed, exist now, and always will exist. [1]
    Matter can be converted into energy and energy can be converted into matter. described by Dr. Albert Einstein's E = mc2 [originally m = E/c2] where E = energy, m = mass, and c2 = the speed of light [186,000 miles per second] squared [c x c = 186,000 mps. x 186,000 mps.]. [2]
    Causality consists of chains of causes-and-effects leading back to the source of causality.
    The source of causality was not caused but has always existed in the past, exists now in the present, and is expected to exist in the future. To ask what caused the source of causality only indicates that the person asking the question does not understand the concept of the source of causality and the related principle that the source of causality causes causality but is not caused and is therefore not an effect. Whereas chains of causes-and-effects lead back to the source of causality, the source of causality is the beginning and the end of all chains of causality. To think that all people/objects/events including the source of causality have causes would require asking the question of what caused the source of causality. This question is irrational because the source of causality cannot be caused—it is what causes all causes that cause effects. This assertion is not an opinion but is an awareness of the fact which is the principle that the source of causality is the beginning and end of all causal sequences.  Therefore, the substance of causality—matter/energy—is not caused but instead causes people/objects/events which are forms of matter/energy.
 
    Question: How can an object/event cause other objects/events without itself being caused?
    Answer: The nature of matter/energy causes causality: matter/energy can cause effects, has caused effects, and will cause effects.

    Matter/energy consists of elementary particles and their related energy, which cause subatomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.), which cause atoms, which cause molecules, which cause inorganic and organic objects/events. Elementary particles whizzing around and crashing into other elementary particles can cause subatomic particles which can whiz around and cause atoms which can combine to cause molecules which can combine to cause other objects and events. The fact that all this happens is not a mystery: how it happens is the subject of science, and those explanations of how it happens which are mysterious now may not be mysterious in the future.
    Matter/energy is real—it is the source of causality.

Knowledge and Belief

    Knowledge is the set of verified/true concepts, principles and techniques for using the concepts and principles which is the current understanding of the causality of natural phenomena—the people, objects and events who/which are reality and who/which cause other people/objects/events. Knowledge is the accurate mental representation of causality. Knowledge, however, is subject to continuous improvement as people discover the causality among people/objects/events.
    Belief is the set of unverified concepts, principles and techniques for using the concepts and principles which is a current expectation of the causality of natural phenomena.
    Beliefs are usually based upon reasons, which, in turn, are usually based upon facts which serve, at least, as temporary and partial (incomplete) proof of the causality asserted in the beliefs. Beliefs are generally held because of reasons, defined as descriptions of the causality expected to be among people/objects/events [causality being the people/objects/events {as causes} who/which cause other people/objects/events {as effects}], but those reasons are subject to challenge and reinterpretation in terms of the requirement for proof of the causality among people/objects/events.

Verification and Falsification

Verification is proving true/confirming a proposition, an assertion, a claim of fact, or an hypothesis.
    To verify is to prove true. To confirm is to prove true. To verify is to prove true [confirm] a concept, principle or technique. To prove (to prove true is to verify a concept, principle or technique.

Falsification is proving false/denying/disconfirming a proposition, an assertion, a claim of fact, or an hypothesis.
    To deny/falsify is to prove not true, to prove false. To disconfirm is to prove false. To deny/falsify is to prove false [disconfirm] a concept, principle or technique.

Verification and falsification are achieved by the use of proof, evidence, support for a claim of fact, a confirmation or denial of an hypothesis, or a justification for an opinion, a belief.

Proof

Proof is (1) the physical evidence--the people/objects/events comprised of matter and energy, or (2) the eyewitness reports, and/or (3) the logical arguments which verify or falsify a proposition, an assertion, a claim of fact, or an hypothesis.

    Proof consists of —
  1. Physical evidence consisting of people/objects/events who/which can be, have been and will be observed/measured by people who have used their normal five perceptual senses of sight/hearing/touch/smell/taste [and using, if necessary, devices such as telescopes, microscopes, and audio amplifiers, etc., to aid and augment their five perceptual senses].
  2. Eyewitness reports of observed/measured people/objects/events who/which are physical evidence from credible witnesses. Credible shall mean the witness is verified by the observations of other people to be truthful, competent, mentally stable, and not likely to be making eyewitness reports for personal gain but, instead, to provide information which can be used by all people as knowledge to be used for making decisions and for solving problems. Eyewitness reports must be corroborated by credible corroborating reports from credible corroborators.
  3. Logical arguments consisting of verifiable and verified premises leading to a valid conclusion which has to be true if the premises are true. The people/objects/events of the concepts, principles and techniques who/which are the premises of a logical argument must be verifiable and falsifiable, therefore they must be real, as contrasted with ideas about people/objects/events which are speculations which cannot be verified nor falsified. The verification of the premises must be beyond a doubt; otherwise the unverified premises shall not serve as proof that the conclusion is necessarily true.
All scientists must follow The Code of Science .

The Code of Science

I. Science is the organized study of the people/objects/events who/which are the natural phenomena of reality for the purpose of determining the causality among the people/objects/events of reality.
    Causality is the cause-and-effect relationships among the people/objects/events. Causality describes which people/objects/events cause other people/objects/events.

II. Scientists must create operational definitions of the terms they wish to use so they can communicate effectively with themselves, with other scientists, and with nonscientists. [3]
    Operational definitions are definitions which present the observations and/or measurements [descriptions] of the people/objects/events who/which are natural phenomena; operational definitions can be used to define complex and abstract concepts, principles and techniques. For example, children often use sentence structures of "_____ [concept/principle being defined] is when _____ [observation/measurement/description of the actions/reactions of people/objects/events being operationally defined]." A child may create an operational definition of love in the following way: "Love is when someone says they like you and they do nice things for you and with you." The child's observation/measurement/description of the actions/reactions of someone who loves provides an operational definition of the term love.

III. Scientists must follow the scientific method in determining the causality of people/objects/events.

The Scientific Method

  1. Specify the unit of study [the people/objects/events to be studied].
  2. Observe and/or measure the units of study to gather data.
  3. Create a causal hypothesis which describes and predicts the causes of effects among the people/objects/events who/which are the units of study.
  4. Observe/measure more people/objects/events who/which are units of study to gather additional data which can be used to confirm [verify] or deny the causal hypothesis].
  5. Determine if or not the additional data confirm/verify or deny the causal hypothesis.

  6. If the data confirm the causal hypothesis, then let other people know of the hypothesis and the scientific method that lead to the creation and confirmation of the hypothesis, and declare the verified/confirmed hypothesis to be a scientific law/law of nature; but if the data do not confirm the causal hypothesis, then either revise the hypothesis to fit the data, or else create a new hypothesis and follow the Scientific Method Steps 4-6.
    Thus, the scientific method requires observation of the people/objects/events of reality and does not allow speculation or religious dogma to be passed off as facts/truth.

IV. Scientists must list the scientific principles they have determined to be verified laws of nature, so other people can know what scientists claim to be knowledge. Moreover, scientists must publish/present the observations and measurements of natural phenomena (units of study) by which they created and by which they confirmed/verified their causal hypotheses in order that other scientists may replicate/duplicate their observations and measurements to confirm/deny their causal hypotheses and claims of scientific principles.
 

Bibliography

[1] The First Law of Thermodynamics [the study of heat]: Matter and energy are the “stuff” of which all objects and events of reality are comprised. Matter and energy cannot be destroyed but only changed in form (results from thermodynamic—heat—experiments by Sadi Carnot and chemical experiments by Antoine LeVoissier). Matter can be changed into energy and energy can be changed into matter. Matter and energy are therefore eternal—without beginning nor end.
    The convertibility of matter and energy was described by Dr. Albert Einstein by E = mc2 [E = Energy; m = mass; c = the speed of light; c2 = the speed of light squared] and m = E/c2 [Einstein’s original equation], which state that matter can be converted into energy (the process of fission: atomic bombs, nuclear energy), and energy can be converted into matter (the process of fusion: hydrogen bombs).

On the First Law of Thermodynamics:
Alan Isaacs, John Daintith and Elizabeth Martin, eds.
Concise Science Dictionary
Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, New York, NY U.S.A.
p. 691.

Siegfried Mandel, ed.
Dictionary of Science
Dell Publishing Co., Inc., 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY 10017, 1975.
p. 333.

[2] On Dr. Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity, and E = mc2:

Albert Einstein, translated by Robert W. Lawson
Relativity: The Special and General Theory
Crown Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, 1961.
pp. 45-48.

Charles Proteus Steinmetz
Four Lectures on Relativity and Space
Dover Publications, inc., 180 Varick Street, New York, NY 10014, originally published by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1923.
pp. 8, 44.

Jeremy Bernstein
Einstein
Penguin Books, 625 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022, U.S.A, 1976.
pp. 97-98.
 
[3] Stanovich, Keith
How To Think Straight About Psychology
Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL, 1989

“... In short, the explanation of phenomena, not the analysis of language, is the goal of the scientist. The key to progress in all the sciences has been to abandon essentialism and to adopt operationalism ... . [p. 39.]

Where ... does the meaning of concepts in science come from if not from discussions about language? What are the criteria for the appropriate usage of a scientific concept? To answer these questions, we must discuss operationism, an idea that is crucial for the construction of theory in science, and one that is especially important for evaluating theoretical claims in psychology.” [p. 39.]

“Although there are different forms of operationism, it is most useful ... to think of it in the most general way. Operationism is simply the idea the concepts in scientific theories must in some way be grounded in, or linked to, observable events that can be measured. Linking the concept to an observable event is the operational definition of a concept and makes the concept public. The operational definition removes the concept from the feelings and intuitions of a particular individual and allows it to be tested by anyone who can carry out the measurable operations.” [p. 39.]

“The link between concepts and observable operations can vary greatly in [the] degree of directness or indirectness. Some scientific concepts are defined almost entirely by observable operations in the real world. [Other] concepts [are] defined only partially by these direct links. ...[The] use of some concepts is determined by both a set of operations and the particular concept’s relationship to other theoretical constructs. [There] are concepts that are not directly defined by observable operations but are linked to other concepts that are. These have only an indirect operational definition, one that comes from other concepts that are defined more directly by observable operations.” [p. 40.]

“Thus, although theoretical concepts differ in how closely they are linked to observations, all concepts acquire their meaning partially through their link to such observations, a point emphasized by noted Harvard philosopher W. V. Quine: ‘The sentences of science, no matter how theoretical, acquire what meaning they have through a network of sentence-to-sentence links whose starting point is sensory stimulation. All evidence for the truth of a scientific theory, moreover, is drawn from sensory observation through the same network.’ (1985, p. 32.) In short, operationism, not debate about language, determines the meaning of concepts in science.” [p. 40.]